EDIT: Let’s cool it with the downvotes, dudes. We’re not out to cut funding to your black hole detection chamber or revoke the degrees of chiropractors just because a couple of us don’t believe in it, okay? Chill out, participate with the prompt and continue with having a nice day. I’m sure almost everybody has something to add.

    • doctorcrimson@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      11 months ago

      Proof of gravity from an unknown source affecting an object isn’t indicative of that source’s characteristics, though.

      • NoneOfUrBusiness@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        11 months ago

        I mean yeah that’s why it’s called dark matter. Because we know nothing about it except that it has gravity and doesn’t interact much (if at all) with electromagnetic waves.

        • doctorcrimson@lemmy.worldOP
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          11 months ago

          The problem is Dark Matter is a theory that proposes specifically currently unobserved matter exists to solve our math problem. That’s not something we can automatically assume, imo. It’s looking highly probable, but not certain. It’s not just a blanket term for impossible to understand forces, okay, it’s not a pseudonym for C’Thulu, it’s a very specific solution among many.

          • GigglyBobble@kbin.social
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            11 months ago

            Nobody “automatically assumes” anything. Dark matter is the best candidate of possible explanations because it explains observation and still fits the standard model. Even if they find the necessary particles eventually, nobody would call it certain though. Certainty is a unicorn.