• Mugita Sokio@discuss.online
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    16 hours ago

    You don’t consent by not using one of those devices, period. On top of that, this should be a massive violation of multiple laws everywhere. Of course, corpos will corpo, and bypass laws at their pleasure.

    • Vanth@reddthat.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      10 hours ago

      Your consent doesn’t matter (legally) in a single-party consent state. Which includes some bigs like New York and Texas. California is a two-party consent state though, so theoretically these people should be informing each other that they are using recording equipment.

      • Mugita Sokio@discuss.online
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        5 hours ago

        I don’t think you see what I’m getting at yet. What I said was that not buying one of those devices, among others, is the way you don’t consent to your 4th Amendment rights being violated. Now, if a device like that is usable with a de-Googled solution, as long as it’s hardened right, then at the very least, it shows you don’t consent to the corporate spying. Government spying though… good luck with that.