• Auth@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 days ago

    I was laughing today seeing the same users who have been calling AI a bullshit machine posting articles like “grok claims this happened”. Very funny how quick people switch up when it aligns with them.

  • ronigami@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 days ago

    I mean, it is objectively bad for life. Throwing away millions to billions of gallons of water all so you can get some dubious coding advice.

  • Empricorn@feddit.nl
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 days ago

    Whether intentional or not, this is gaslighting. “Here’s the trendy reaction those wacky lemmings are currently upvoting!”

    Getting to the core issue, of course we’re sick of AI, and have a negative opinion of it! It’s being forced into every product, whether it makes sense or not. It’s literally taking developer jobs, then doing worse. It’s burning fossil fuels and VC money and then hallucinating nonsense, but still it’s being jammed down our throats when the vast memory of us see no use-case or benefit from it. But feel free to roll your eyes at those acknowledging the truth…

  • ssillyssadass@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    3 days ago

    I find it very funny how just a mere mention of the two letters A and I will cause some people to seethe and fume, and go on rants about how much they hate AI, like a conservative upon seeing the word “pronouns.”

  • skisnow@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    3 days ago

    The reason most web forum posters hate AI is because AI is ruining web forums by polluting it with inauthentic garbage. Don’t be treating it like it’s some sort of irrational bandwagon.

  • chunes@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    3 days ago

    I’m a lot more sick of the word ‘slop’ than I am of AI. Please, when you criticize AI, form an original thought next time.

  • Rose@slrpnk.net
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    3 days ago

    The currently hot LLM technology is very interesting and I believe it has legitimate use cases. If we develop them into tools that help assist work. (For example, I’m very intrigued by the stuff that’s happening in the accessibility field.)

    I mostly have problem with the AI business. Ludicruous use cases (shoving AI into places where it has no business in). Sheer arrogance about the sociopolitics in general. Environmental impact. LLMs aren’t good enough for “real” work, but snake oil salesmen keep saying they can do that, and uncritical people keep falling for it.

    And of course, the social impact was just not what we were ready for. “Move fast and break things” may be a good mantra for developing tech, but not for releasing stuff that has vast social impact.

    I believe the AI business and the tech hype cycle is ultimately harming the field. Usually, AI technologies just got gradually developed and integrated to software where they served purpose. Now, it’s marred with controversy for decades to come.

  • DeathByBigSad@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    3 days ago

    Reminder that Lemmy is typically older and older people are usually more conservative about things. Sure, politcially, Lemmy leans left, but technologically, Lemmy is very conservative.

    Like for example, you see people on Lemmy say they’ll switch to a dumbphone, but that’s probably even more insecure, and they could’ve just used Lineage OS or something and it would be far more private.

  • qyron@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    3 days ago

    True. Now shut up and take my upvote! Jo need for arguments; all has already been said.