• MrSoup@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    14 days ago

    I thought of it too, but that way I should whitelist a lot of sites which doesn’t load readable w/o js, a lot of sites I randomly visit just one time ever for one random thing. Would make my workflow just slower.

    Did you encounter a lot of broken by default sites w/o js? Or is it bearable? I could make the switch too.

    • fading_person@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      14 days ago

      Is there a viable way to block only unnecessary js, while loading the minimum necessary to properly render the sites?

    • piefood@feddit.online
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      14 days ago

      I find some sites like that, but for the most part, if not having JS breaks the site, then I just move on. It’s very rare that there is only one website where I can find the information that I need.

      I also have it set up so that it’s just one button to re-enable JS, so it’s quick and easy to turn on if I decide to do so.