• thatcrow@ttrpg.networkBanned
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    4 days ago

    None.

    Nothing that’s a ‘hit’ in the modern day will have any of the staying power of say, Beethoven.

    Even now, hits are dead within a few years. The average person is being conditioned to only ‘consume’ entertainment that has been recently released.

    To hopefully drive this point home, notice how Weird Al parodies have more staying power than the songs he’s parodying? Nobody thinks this will be the case when a song is new and the consumer bandwagon is being told to like it.

    I’m sure people thought, say, something like SAIL would ‘stand the test of time,’ but it’s actually cringe as fuck to listen to now. That’s not going to change as time passes.

    Notice how Elvis, the ‘king of rock’ has no staying power? I’m sure if you told people that he’d be irrelevant now a few decades ago, they’d look at you like you’re crazy. Meanwhile, literally nobody gives a shit about Elvis unless they’re trying to be different or for whatever reason had his music shoved down their throat.

    There is contemporary music that will stand the test of time, like from Ulrich Schnauss and Felix Laband.

    But have you even heard of either of those?

    • angstylittlecatboy@reddthat.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      2 days ago

      You seem to have a bias where the only music that matters to you is Intelligent Dance Music and maybe classical.

      I listened to a bit of Ulrich Schnauss while typing this (Blumenthal which played into Clear Day) and…it was aight. I don’t usually listen to dance music, so there’s probably something I’m missing, but the way you talked it up as the only modern music that matters, I was expecting some crazy composition techniques that you’d never hear in anything even remotely pop-adjacent.

      notice how Weird Al parodies have more staying power than the songs he’s parodying

      I can name one song where I think this is true (Ridin’ Dirty > White and Nerdy.) Seriously I have no idea where this comes from.

      Notice how Elvis, the ‘king of rock’ has no staying power?

      But what about the Beatles? They have a lot more longevity and aren’t that much younger. Elvis was the king of an embryonic form of Rock and Roll, and in general I don’t think the earliest versions of genres age well. The earliest forms of hip hop are generally seen as being cheesy and having extremely simple flows, and if you try to throw back to them today, you’re seen as making a shallow parody of hip hop, but when you get to the styles that came to prominence in the 90s, the songs are still widely listened to and beloved. Anecdotally I have trouble seeing pre-bebop jazz as jazz. Bebop is what brought in so much of the complexity that we associate with jazz today.

    • GreenKnight23@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      4 days ago

      Notice how Elvis, the ‘king of rock’ has no staying power? I’m sure if you told people that he’d be irrelevant now a few decades ago, they’d look at you like you’re crazy. Meanwhile, literally nobody gives a shit about Elvis unless they’re trying to be different or for whatever reason had his music shoved down their throat.

      1000001864

  • HobbitFoot @thelemmy.club
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    4 days ago

    Pink Pony Club by Chappell Roan, released in 2023.

    It’s got hooks and it speaks to an interesting form of teenage rebellion/identity. I feel like the song is a modern form of “This isn’t just a phase, it’s who I am!”

    • Rob Bos@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      4 days ago

      I only just heard this the first time recently and it’s got some stickiness to it! Definitely a song people will recognize a couple decades from now. Centuries, maybe not.

  • HobbitFoot @thelemmy.club
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    4 days ago

    ONE MORE TIME by blink-182, released in 2023.

    That song is pretty good, has a great emotional core to it, and seems perfectly made for reunions.

  • LainTrain@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    5 days ago

    Few years old now but I think the first few songs on Brat are fine tbh I don’t see myself not ever listening to them again. That’s probably the closest I come to pop music tho

  • rudyharrelson@lemmy.radio
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    5 days ago

    I think “Uptown Funk” by Bruno Mars/Mark Ronson (2014) and “Can’t Stop the Feeling” by Justin Timberlake (2016) are strong contenders when it comes to contemporary dance music. They feel as fresh today as they did a decade ago, and I think they will age well because they exemplify the fundamentals of the genre. They’re energetic, catchy, and have a je ne sais quoi that makes them stand out in a crowd. If I’m throwing a party, these two tracks are easily on the track list for the evening.

    • Denjin@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      5 days ago

      OP: gimme some contemporary music

      Rudyharrelson: here’s some songs from a decade ago

      ^although I have to admit I agree with your choices^

      • rudyharrelson@lemmy.radio
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        4 days ago

        I don’t think pop music has evolved so much in the last 10 years that either of those songs would be outside of the definition of “contemporary music”.

      • YappyMonotheist@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        5 days ago

        I mean, it’s still within the “contemporary” timeframe, right? Had they mentioned disco or even 90s/00s pop like Britney and BSBs, I’d understand the disagreement. 😅

  • 9point6@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    5 days ago

    Depends what you define as a “hit” or “standing the test of time”

    In a literal sense, all of it will because it’s unlikely for music to just disappear in 2025

    In terms of people still caring about it? Still most of it, nostalgia means what people listen to when they’re young determines at least a fraction of what they listen to when older.

    In terms of still coming up in conversation, it’s more important to look at the artist than the individual tracks. Those who are truly talented and compose their own interesting tracks consistently over a good number of years, will still be talked about and their tracks will still be played. I think longevity is probably a big factor, if Pink Floyd only ever released dark side of the moon (I know PatGoD was their first) and then disappeared, I don’t think they would be remotely as influential.