If so, then why?

  • essell@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    5 months ago

    Remember, there is a mechanism that prevents criminals from winning elections and holding offices, it’s the one that’s the best one in a democracy. The voters.

    It’s not good to give governments the power to decide who does and doesn’t deserve to hold authority, it is good to let voters decide if someone’s crimes are relevant to the election.

    Sadly, it seems many Americans do not agree with me that trump is not suitable for office. Hopefully enough do that they decide not to vote for him

    • SkyNTP@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      5 months ago

      We’ve got these things called “social media” that are built expressly for the purpose of influencing people to buy more stuff (literally in the name: influencers). And if it can get people to part with their money, you can be sure the same tools can be used to get people to vote against their own interests.

      We thought the internet was a tool to spread democracy. We were wrong. The Internet is a tool used to undermine democracy, so long as people using the Internet are not strongly inoculated against organized interests, foreign, and domestic.

      • dudinax@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        5 months ago

        Who thought the intent was to spread Democracy?

        The Internet’s been both very good and very bad for Democracy. Without the internet, most people would be at the mercy of CNN or Fox to explain all the horrible things Donny Two Scoops has done.