Gamers like to make it sound like $70 is a new thing today for video games. When, I’ve seen adverts of games back in late 90s and early 90s that were priced $70. It’s always been around so I find it ridiculous that so many of them complain that the pricing is too high when, it’s been a thing.

Even more dumb is that sales are stupidly frequent so why even bother trying to pay $70 anyways besides FOMO.

    • SanguinePar@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      5 months ago

      Yep, I paid £65 for Street Fighter 2 on the Megadrive, back in the early 90s. A huge amount of money then, but worth it given how much I played it.

    • Susaga@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      5 months ago

      …The fucking console only cost $100. If that ad is the default, that’s fucking insane.

      • j4k3@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        5 months ago

        No console went for $100 new when it first came out. Those were the prices long after the economy of scale made it a profitable gamble to sell the hardware at a loss to drive game sales and make up the difference and then some.

        I remember Super Nintendo games at ~$60-$70 at first release. They quickly came down in price to ~$40-$50 after a month or two.

      • SanguinePar@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        5 months ago

        That’s the second generation of Genesis/Megadrive, so at that point they were probably selling it as a loss leader having minimised production costs.

        The real money is in the games, so you make the console cheap and create more customers for the games.