Tony Bark@pawb.social to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish · 23 days agoNet neutrality advocates won’t appeal loss, say they don’t trust Supreme Courtarstechnica.comexternal-linkmessage-square40linkfedilinkarrow-up11arrow-down10
arrow-up11arrow-down1external-linkNet neutrality advocates won’t appeal loss, say they don’t trust Supreme Courtarstechnica.comTony Bark@pawb.social to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish · 23 days agomessage-square40linkfedilink
minus-squareZachariah@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up0·23 days agoBummer. They since the outcome would be the same, they should make the SC go on record to rule on it. Put it in the history books.
minus-squareNatanael@infosec.publinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up0·23 days agoAnything can be reconsidered by a later SCOTUS if they’re willing
minus-squareAnti_Iridium@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up0·23 days agoYeah, stare decisis means nothing anymore according to this Supreme court. They bend over backwards to get the outcome they desire.
minus-squareZorsith@lemmy.blahaj.zonelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up0·23 days agoThey could also deliberately go out of their way to make it worse.
minus-squareRentlar@lemmy.calinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up0·23 days agoKnowing this Supreme Court, it could totally be worse than the same outcome.
Bummer. They since the outcome would be the same, they should make the SC go on record to rule on it. Put it in the history books.
Then it can’t be appealed later.
Anything can be reconsidered by a later SCOTUS if they’re willing
Yeah, stare decisis means nothing anymore according to this Supreme court.
They bend over backwards to get the outcome they desire.
They could also deliberately go out of their way to make it worse.
Knowing this Supreme Court, it could totally be worse than the same outcome.