Sjmarf@sh.itjust.works to Lemmy Shitpost@lemmy.worldEnglish · 6 days agoOne Angry Mansh.itjust.worksimagemessage-square255linkfedilinkarrow-up11arrow-down10
arrow-up11arrow-down1imageOne Angry Mansh.itjust.worksSjmarf@sh.itjust.works to Lemmy Shitpost@lemmy.worldEnglish · 6 days agomessage-square255linkfedilink
minus-squareudon@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up0·4 days agoOne thing spoiler One piece (not sure we can defractionalize as well?)
minus-square5too@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up0·edit-24 days agoAccording to https://www.chicagomanualofstyle.org/qanda/data/faq/topics/Numbers/faq0058.html, pieces can be - if you write that piece as a decimal rather than a fraction of one whole!
minus-squareJackbyDev@programming.devlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up0·4 days agoThe show isn’t called 1.0 Pieces or One Pieces or Many Pieces. It’s called One Piece. It’s singular. The intro to the show even makes it so clear how singular it is lol. All of the treasure is in ONE PIECE. I don’t even watch the show lol.
One thing
spoiler
One piece (not sure we can defractionalize as well?)
One piece is not plural
According to https://www.chicagomanualofstyle.org/qanda/data/faq/topics/Numbers/faq0058.html, pieces can be - if you write that piece as a decimal rather than a fraction of one whole!
The show isn’t called 1.0 Pieces or One Pieces or Many Pieces. It’s called One Piece. It’s singular. The intro to the show even makes it so clear how singular it is lol. All of the treasure is in ONE PIECE. I don’t even watch the show lol.