• finitebanjo@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 days ago

    Reminds me of that town that Musk basically bought a while back, promising a spaceport or something, and all they really got out of it is a lot of noise and pollution.

  • Bubbey@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 days ago

    Will AI finally be the push we needed to seriously invest in Nuclear 100%? I’d rather that than solar panel companies create a bunch of garbage to say that they’re “saving le planet”

  • Naevermix@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 days ago

    Can imagine, but hey, someone’s gotta pay for all those Sora videos I’m generating and trashing because the subject had too many extremities.

  • SocialMediaRefugee@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 days ago

    Remember how we were told to switch to led lights and efficient appliances to conserve power? Guess it was just to save it for data centers.

    • gian @lemmy.grys.it
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 days ago

      Yes, and my bill become 1/5 of what it was, so maybe is was a not so stupid thing to do.

    • Tollana1234567@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 days ago

      its was so that coal/gas/oil dont need to reduce thier own footprint, they moved onto “you should reduce yours” and were funding fake eco-activism and “reduce your footprint companies” so we dont do it.

  • jsomae@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    3 days ago

    But this proposed data center is so big, it would have its own dedicated energy from gas generation and renewable sources

    Very unfortunate, as this could have been an opportunity to advance the green power agenda. Solar, wind, and nuclear are all more efficient than fossil fuels – so why build new fossil fuel plants?

    • gian @lemmy.grys.it
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 days ago

      Because solar and wind plants, while they can be cheap and relatively fast to build, are not as reliable as a datacenter need and it is not predictable, so at most they can supplement some other generation method, in this scenario. Then ok, you probably need less fossil fuel (but gas is not necessary fossil these days).
      And a nuclear plant is probably way longer to build than the datacenter itself, if you ever get the green light to build it.

  • Basic Glitch@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    3 days ago

    I’m starting to think this is how they ease us into accepting the argument they need to grind us up for biofuel.

    “Sorry kids, it turns out deregulation of nuclear safety and all these small modular nuclear reactors we built still isn’t enough to power the data centers.”

    “Good news, we have this new idea: You know how there’s just way too many of you bc we’ve been banning birth control methods and spreading misinformation about declining birth rates? And there’s also not enough food bc of tariffs and a lack of available labor to harvest all those crops we let rot?”

    To be fair, in exchange we will still get to enjoy terrible AI generated art and music.

    • AwesomeLowlander@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      3 days ago

      misinformation about declining birth rates

      What misinformation? Every expert on the subject is agreeing that we’re at or below replacement rate.

      • Basic Glitch@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        3 days ago

        I mean my opinion is if your plan is to take away everybody’s healthcare, collapse the economy, close public schools, and decrease quality of life in general, plus do all these other crazy things that put the mother’s life at risk, why would it be a good idea to encourage as many new births as possible?

        Also, I know n=1 but I really wanted to have another kid last year, but put it off specifically bc of the crazy laws Republicans started passing that put maternal health at risk. Honestly, I’m relieved I didn’t bc the economy has also gotten so bad since then and everything is so uncertain. Now when I read stories about brain dead women being forced to be kept alive to carry a fetus and give birth it makes me wonder if I’ll ever want to risk having another baby.

        I think it’s dishonest to pretend that current birthrates in the U.S. at least aren’t in part a reflection of many women’s fears about giving birth during such a chaotic time.

    • jsomae@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      3 days ago

      I said this elsewhere, but it will have its own dedicated power supply.

    • empireOfLove2@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      3 days ago

      Its going to ruin most states around it too, Wyoming is a massive net electricity exporter, due to cheap coal and wind resources. A majority of what they produce is transmitted to neighboring states, as far as Oregon and Washington.