• 0 Posts
  • 149 Comments
Joined 2 years ago
cake
Cake day: October 1st, 2023

help-circle


  • Why be a dick about it when you can just ignore them. Seems like they’re just trying to communicate in a way that’s generally experienced as nice.

    Like I get it, it’s easy to get annoyed at people trying to “make” you participate in an imaginary and kinda lame social behaviour… But like, being a dick on purpose probably does you more damage than them

    No one likes someone whose rude for the sake of being rude, or an edgelord, even being a contrarian just for the sake of it isn’t the greatest characteristic.

    Better to find a stable calm attitude that doesn’t require that… And if it’s a way to blow off steam, better to find ways that are more in your own domain of control, rather than having it controlled by an external trigger.

    Something to give thought to next time your driving jeep anyways.













  • It’s because the male ones believe their courses have informed them, and turned them into “knowledge experts” who know better than you. Where as female case managers believe their courses have made them better at connecting people to their resources and practices.

    In short, whether conscious or not, the courses they do have different gendered outlooks and effects of participants.

    One group becomes entitled ro superiority, and the others becomes a more connected listener.

    But it might also be because men lack the lived experience most compatible with your own, and it’s possible they’re better at providing for male clients.

    …but really I think women are just likely better at the job, and more likely to be sensitive to the needs of others in a more consistent and accurate manner.


  • They don’t recall information from a repository, the repository is translated into a set of topic based weighted probabilities of what words come next.

    Those probabilities are then used to reconstruct a best-guess at what words are next when generating strings of language.

    It’s not recall, it’s a form of “free” association, which is quite tightly bounded to the context, topic, and weightings of the training data.

    This is not precise and is more likely to create average answers and sentences, rather than precise ones.

    It’s not recall, it’s really convincing lies.

    “He seems to know what he’s talking about, and speaks with a certain kind of authority which makes sense and sounds knowledgeable”.


  • Your argument isn’t coherent, as you’re attributing a single phenomena to being caused by a willful ignorance and the rose coloured glasses of forgetfulness or absent minded ignorance.

    Which is why you’re shifting goal posts to a position you believe is implied but is actually your own contradictory construction, and of your own making.

    Anyways I don’t think I’ll get anywhere with you, as you’re liable to such falsifications and implicit strawmanning.

    Have fun arguing with positions you’re making up for yourself. Strange hobby, but whatever. It probably keeps you occupied, so who am I to judge.


  • “It’d be a weird sort of person who doesn’t willfully ignore reality”

    No, that’s not anything that was actually said, or even the sentiment expressed.

    You are, very childish and immature in how you disscuss topics. It must create either great frustration for you, or fill your time.

    Good luck with whatever it is you’re seeking.