A US tech company says its chief executive has quit after he was apparently caught on a big screen at a Coldplay concert embracing a female co-worker, in a clip that went viral.

The clip showed a man and a woman hugging on a jumbo screen at the arena in Foxborough, Massachusetts, before they abruptly ducked and hid from the camera.

The pair were identified in US media as Mr Byron, a married chief executive of Astronomer, and Kristin Cabot, the firm’s chief people officer.

  • FelixCress@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    11 hours ago

    You can be sleeping with your employees dude that’s a clear power imbalance dynamic and you would be fired here too for having a relationship with a subordinate.

    Educate yourself.

    https://www.employmentlawreview.co.uk/personal-relationships-at-work-what-does-uk-law-say/

    You can be forced to disclose relationships and sacked if you fail to do so. You cannot be sacked for having a relationship.

    Completely banning personal relationships at work would likely breach an employee’s right to a private life. However, that doesn’t mean employers can’t put measures in place to mitigate risks to the business caused by such relationships. Policies employers may want to consider implementing include:

    Ensuring that employees disclose any workplace relationships they have so that appropriate steps can be taken to minimise risks

    Restricting employees who deal with recruitment from the process if it involves someone they have a personal relationship with

    Potentially changing an employee’s manager if they’re in a relationship with their current one, providing this doesn’t discriminate against them

    • Modern_medicine_isnt@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      39 minutes ago

      Note in your first paragraph of the quote, it only says likely. So even they admit that there is wiggle room. Nothing in the article specifically protected the right to have a relationship with a subordinate, and in fact says if disclosed they can move people so they are no long subordinate as a result of thier relationship. Which is clearly not saying that company policy can’t involve consequences for having a relationship with a subordinate.

      The CEO wasn’t transparent about it to the board, so he can be fired for that.

      He was married, so he would be breaking a law by having sex with anyone else in many jurisdictions, and the bad image/press that gives the company would be enough to fire him even if it wasn’t illegal where he is.

      The liability alone that she “could” claim she felt pressured into the relationship because he was the boss would likely give them cause to fire him based on his contract.

      • FelixCress@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        9 hours ago

        Read again. You cannot be sacked for having a relationship and companies are not allowed to forbid that. Admit you were wrong and move on.

        • Modern_medicine_isnt@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          35 minutes ago

          Your article clearly says they can have policies about it. The penalty for not following policies is often termination. So the article doesn’t say what you are claiming it does.

        • dependencyinjection@discuss.tchncs.de
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          9 hours ago

          Hey if you can show me some legal precedence then perhaps I’ll admit to being wrong but you only provided a non official article discussing this not some legal precedence of these rules in employment contracts being contested and overturned in a court of law.