• Doug Holland@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 days ago

    It doesn’t matter.

    If someone unearthed video of Trump raping an 11-year-old, Republicans would love him even more, his approval ratings would go up, leaders on the “religious right” would explain that it’s all Biblical, and Trump would successfully sue for the profits from video sales.

    • ObjectivityIncarnate@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 days ago

      If you truly believe this, you need to take a step back from one or more echo chambers, because you’ve lost touch with reality.

      Trump waffling on the topic, without any ‘hard’ evidence, has already caused momentum in the opposite direction.

      • ayyy@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 days ago

        But it’s just performative resistance. They still vote to give him everything he wants every time without exception.

        • ObjectivityIncarnate@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          2 days ago

          But it’s just performative resistance.

          That’s your assumption, not a fact. If hard evidence of Donald Trump literally raping a child was made public during his last campaign, I’d bet my life savings he wouldn’t be President today.

    • slaneesh_is_right@lemmy.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 days ago

      That’s my takeaway too. What are americans gonna do about it? Nothing. He’d just gain popularity and the church will like him more too because of their common interests

    • SilentStorms@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 days ago

      I’d usually agree with this sentiment, but the MAGAsphere actually seems to be breaking with him on this one. The chuds are upset about this, and it might not go away so easily, especially now that he’s attacking his base over this.

      • aesthelete@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        2 days ago

        Well one of the things that nobody seems to have considered is that Elon has a bot army, an AI, and Twitter he can turn against Trump.

        In addition, and it may or may not be a coincidence, but he’s not as buddy buddy with Putin as he once was.

        • ScatterBrain@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          edit-2
          2 days ago

          I absolutely believe Putin is fueling this. President Vance is a collaborative agent for Peter Thiel and the Heritage Foundation. Heritage is a longtime Putin ally. The question is, will MAGA stop questioning their echo chamber after Trump is put out to rot? That is the gamble, and they are going for it.

          • BrainInABox@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            2 days ago

            I absolutely believe Putin is fueling this.

            Yeah, but liberals believe that Putin is behind everything, so that’s not surprising

            • ScatterBrain@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              edit-2
              2 days ago

              … because he has a ton of global influence??? He’s former KGB, one of the greatest misinformation diseminators of history. If you don’t believe that, you like consume some of it.

              • BrainInABox@lemmy.ml
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                2 days ago

                Ok. That doesn’t mean he’s behind literally everything the way liberals make out. The KGB were second rate information manipulators compared to domestic US operations anyway.

                • ScatterBrain@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  2 days ago

                  You are making a strawman argument. I didn’t say I am liberal, nor did I say Putin does everything. I said Putin is likely behind this, because Putin definitely has compromat on Trump. I also said he has global influence, which he does. These statements are obvious, supported by overwhelming evidence, and not so broad as your strawman

                  • BrainInABox@lemmy.ml
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    0
                    ·
                    edit-2
                    2 days ago

                    You are making a strawman argument

                    Oh ok, we’re doing this are we? Alright.

                    I didn’t say I am liberal

                    Argument from silence.

                    because Putin definitely has compromat on Trump.

                    Proof by assertion fallacy.

                    I also said he has global influence, which he does.

                    Proof by assertion

                    These statements are obvious,

                    Ipse Dixit

                    supported by overwhelming evidence

                    Proof by assertion

                    and not so broad as your strawman

                    Fallacy fallacy.

    • qarbone@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      2 days ago

      I don’t like the presumption of video sales for CSAM.

      Edit: not a dig at you, but of the unpleasant viability of that statement.