Of course as concerning as the implications are, a small part of me is thinking “ooooh I can’t wait to see what they create”

  • ChunkMcHorkle@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    The arrangement it makes with adjacent governments is nowhere near as important as the arrangements it makes in regard to physical security at sea.

    Sealand is a stone’s throw from the UK mainland, and even though it is not technically British it benefits from the UK’s very well protected shipping lanes and coastlines. Other parts of the world, not so much. For example, they can park this thing off the east coast of Africa and have zero interference from local governments – for the day and a half it lasts before getting stripped bare by pirates.

    A government that won’t interfere is likely also a government that will not protect them. They need to choose their location wisely.

  • cm0002@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    “I am Andrew Ryan, and I’m here to ask you a question. Is a man not entitled to the sweat of his brow? ‘No!’ says the man in Washington, ‘It belongs to the poor.’ ‘No!’ says the man in the Vatican, ‘It belongs to God.’ ‘No!’ says the man in Moscow, ‘It belongs to everyone.’ I rejected those answers; instead, I chose something different. I chose the impossible. I chose… Rapture, a city where the artist would not fear the censor, where the scientist would not be bound by petty morality, Where the great would not be constrained by the small! And with the sweat of your brow, Rapture can become your city as well.” ~Andrew Ryan, Bioshock

    This is the origin story IRL for Rapture lmfaoo

    • Mahlzeit@feddit.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      “I am Andrew Ryan, and I’m here to ask you a question. Is a man not entitled to the sweat of his brow? ‘No!’ says the man in Washington, ‘It belongs to the poor.’

      How do Americans feel about this attitude?

      • ChunkMcHorkle@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 year ago

        “I am Andrew Ryan, and I’m here to ask you a question. Is a man not entitled to the sweat of his brow? ‘No!’ says the man in Washington, ‘It belongs to the poor.’

        How do Americans feel about this attitude?

        Andrew Ryan does NOT understand Washington at all (prioritizing the poor, lol), nor even American history (slavery, company stores, anti-union legislation, etc).

        But he definitely got the “No!” part right. Whoever that sweaty guy is, the fruits of his labor belong to whoever can monetize it the most inescapably.