• ChallengeApathy@infosec.pub
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    7 months ago

    Honestly, Bluetooth sucks. I’m incredibly sick and tired of everything trying to use ancient technology for far more than it was ever intended. Besides, it never works the way it should anyways.

  • badbrainstorm @lemmy.today
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    7 months ago

    I once lost a pair of expensive Bose wireless headphones. Somebody told me that I could use the app and track their location. I said, oh hell no, they can keep them! Nice as they were, I will not be purchasing again.

    • olicvb@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      7 months ago

      No worries, they can track you with every other tech you have instead

      • badbrainstorm @lemmy.today
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        7 months ago

        I went back to wired. I’m aware the government will get it elsewhere.

        Not paying Bose to have access to it, and sell to whomever they want. Fuck that

        Also, you don’t know jack shit about my tech. I go out with nothing but a DAP very often.

        • olicvb@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          edit-2
          7 months ago

          Even then, any mobile phone can be located with triangulation through cellular towers (afaik, are there carrier vpns?)

          • GolfNovemberUniform@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            edit-2
            7 months ago

            Anything that sends requests to any network can be tracked. You can’t avoid it. That’s why I think having an offline device makes a lot of sense especially for data storage

      • badbrainstorm @lemmy.today
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        7 months ago

        You and all your upvoters like to visit sites about privacy, and give people a hard time for taking measures to protect themselves. Lame

        • olicvb@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          7 months ago

          yea i dont usually post in any random websites, but that makes sense. I guess i mostly meant what i said thinking it’s a waste to toss out something just because of tracking when there are so many other things they can track you with.

  • sabreW4K3@lazysoci.al
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    7 months ago

    Seems the only way to prevent this is by running a firewall, but you can’t run a firewall for Bluetooth connections… Yet.

  • TheButtonJustSpins@infosec.pub
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    7 months ago
    1. Being able to follow Bluetooth beacons is far from new.
    2. The listening in is done by the phone apps, which isn’t a Bluetooth issue.
  • tourist@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    7 months ago

    well I hope the NSA likes the same 10 songs on repeat and video essays about cults

    actually nah fuck em

    I hope they hate it

  • bloodfart@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    7 months ago

    The only thing in the article that has to do with wireless headphones is watching for devices in discoverable mode and using that to physically track movements.

    Most (all that I know of, but I’m a be generous here!) Bluetooth headphones have to be made discoverable temporarily and turn it off after they’re paired, so this is more like you could be tracked locally by an array of bt receivers if you’re walking around with the button on your headphones held down.

    The other thing in the article that applies to all people with phones or computers or whatever is the relatively old news that cops buy data from data brokers instead of doing investigations.