• masterspace@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    2 years ago

    The most important traits for doing well at work (in this order):

    • clear, effective, and efficient communication
    • taking ownership of problems
    • having your boss and team members like you on a personal level
    • competence at your tasks
    • severien@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 years ago

      I’m not sure if the competence is really in the last place. I’d say it’s on the equal level. Great communication and ownership of the problems means little if you can’t really solve the problems.

      • AFK BRB Chocolate (CA version)@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 years ago

        People have those things in spectrums, not all or nothing. You have to have at least some of all of them, but I’d argue that mediocre competency with really good communication and accountability is a better combination that really good competency with one of the others being mediocre.

        • severien@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          2 years ago

          I still kinda disagree. We’re talking here about engineering role after all. I have a colleague who is a code wizard, but has kinda problem with (under)communicating. He’s still widely respected as a very good engineer, people know his communication style and adapt to it.

          But if you’re a mediocre problem solver, you can’t really make up for it with communication skills. That kinda moves you into non-engineering role like PO, SM or perhaps support engineer.

          But I would say this - once you reach a certain high level of competence, then the communication skills, leadership, ownership can become the real differentiating factors. But you can’t really get there without the high level of competence first.

          • raze2012@kbin.social
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            2 years ago

            We’re talking here about engineering role after all.

            where? seemed like general advice.

            Even then, thee aren’t mutually exclusive. your competence will affect how people see you on a personal level, at least at work. And your competence affects your ability to be given problems to own. You’re not gonna give the nice but still inexperienced employee to own an important problem domain. they might be able to work under the owner and gain experience, though.

            Documentation and presentation are highly undervalued, and your ability to understand and spread that knowledge can overcome that lack of experience to actually handle the task yourself.

    • AFK BRB Chocolate (CA version)@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 years ago

      I’m halfway through scrolling this long thread, and this is the first comment I’ve seen that isn’t overly cynical. It’s also correct.

      I’ve been working for 38 years, and I’ve been someone who makes promotion decisions for 15 of them. The third one is helpful, not essential, but the others are super important. The people who rise to leadership positions aren’t necessarily the top technical people, they’re the ones who do those things with a good attitude.

      The other thing I’d add is that they’re people who are able to see the big picture and how the details relate to it, which is part of strategic thinking.

  • GenXen [he/him, any]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 years ago

    That dealing with the bullshit of clique social groups and the fallout of not falling in with them doesn’t end with high school. In fact, it gets even worse in the workplace.

  • GarbageShoot [he/him]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 years ago

    Yeah, looking busy is way more important than being productive a lot of the time. You always need to be doing something, so you just go through the motions of doing things because otherwise you’ll get shit from your employers. Waiting in good faith for more real tasks to emerge isn’t enough, so you must invent chores.

    At least, that was very consistently my experience in retail.

  • masquenox@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 years ago

    I learnt meritocracy is a joke long before I discovered that it was literally invented to be a joke.

  • incogtino@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 years ago

    Your employer does not care about you. You are not important or irreplaceable

    Take your time and energy and put it into your life, not their business

    I have had coworkers die (not work related) and by the time you hear about it (like the next day) they have already worked out who will get the work done so the machine doesn’t have to stop

    • potustheplant@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 years ago

      That way you’re at work during the week while not doing anything productive for yourself or the company and you then spend your free time actually working for your employer. Great idea.

    • ME5SENGER_24@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 years ago

      My uncle spent years preaching to me about the need to be loyal to a company. I never drank the Kool-Aid. He spent 21 years working for an investment banking company in their IT department. 4 years before he was set to retire with a full pension, etc. his company was acquired by a larger bank. He lost everything except his 401k. He then spent the next 12 years working to get his time back so he’d be able to retire. He died 2 years ago and the company sent a bouquet of flowers.

      THE COMPANY DOESN’T CARE ABOUT YOU!!

      • Aux@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 years ago

        How do you lose a pension? It doesn’t matter where you work or if a company gets bought.

        • ME5SENGER_24@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          2 years ago

          So the way he explained it to me was that essentially when the company was purchased all your accruals were reset and the pension was tied to years of service, which he hadn’t reached yet, then with the merger you were essentially a new employee. There was also a lot tied to retirement plans linked to corporate stocks that were basically useless after they merged. Either way, beyond working for the same company forever, his eggs were (mostly) in one basket.

          • Idontreallyknow@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            2 years ago

            Yet another reason to be glad to live in the EU:

            TUPE Regulations

            Basically, “any employee’s contract of employment will be transferred automatically on the same terms as before in the event of a transfer of the undertaking. This means that if an employer changes control of the business, the new employer cannot reduce the employees’ terms and conditions”

            This regulation and strong unions are the backbone of job security in the EU.

    • IninewCrow@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 years ago

      They refer to you as … HUMAN RESOURCES

      You aren’t a person, you are an instrument the company uses to make more money for itself. If you die or can no longer work, you will be replaced by another human resource.

      • Skaryon@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 years ago

        I had a prof twisting himself into knots trying to argue that human resources really is a positive term because companies care about and maintain their resources

    • XEAL@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 years ago

      Not even if you do valuable or efficent stuff for the company. You’re disposable.

      • Lettuce eat lettuce@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 years ago

        The company is always on the lookout for ways to replace you with somebody who will do more for less.

        And in the meantime, they will squeeze you for every drop of effort they think they can get away with.

        • Chapo0114 [comrade/them, he/him]@hexbear.net
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          2 years ago

          Or less for less. I know a woman who is a manager of a dialysis clinic, as soon as she was making over 100k she started getting pushback from higher ups, having more oversight, and having her funds for extra services to patients / staff cut. It’s clear they want her out even though she has the lowest mortality in the region, because they don’t need more than beds filled (Medicaid pays) and legally required minimums to be met.

  • dansity@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 years ago

    People in your workplace don’t know shit. There are a few who know stuff but the majority is dumb, careless or the combination of the two. Surprisingly the higher you go the more dumb and careless there are. We are designing monster billion dollar construction projects and some of my colleagues have problems with understanding written english. Others cannot learn a software that has literally 3 buttons in them they have to press. I don’t even know sometimes why I am trying.

  • krayj@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 years ago

    Your employer is ALWAYS looking for a way to either get more work out of you for the same compensation, or replace you with some one or some process that produces the equivalent output for less cost. The entire idea that employees should be loyal to their employers is one of the most successful propaganda campaigns ever spawned by capitalism.

  • demlet@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 years ago

    Success is mainly about sucking up to the right people. No matter how good you are at your job, you have to know how to play work politics. Most bosses don’t know how to evaluate actual ability, and they’re much less objective than they think. Usually they favor more likeable employees over capable ones if forced to choose. Human life is a popularity contest, always has been, always will be. That’s the side effect of being a highly social species…