No better way to get people who used to voluntarily give you money to give you more money than threatening them.
This donkey about to get taught a lesson by nestle. He probably thinks he’s hot shit now but he poked the devil.
I’m surprised they haven’t killed his children already.
He would wish that he did. He hates his kids
He built a compound for all his kids and baby mommas to live at. I’m sure he excluded his trans kid from that though.
It’s worse for him if they are kept alive because it’s a public reminder how much they hate him. Nestle starting shipping his kids the good food reserved for the lizard people only
They needn’t to do so. His children are dead to him.
Nazi vs Nestle. Always win for us.
let them fight.jpg
Anyone getting sued by him should just demand a jury trial. No way you’ll get enough Americans to side with musk on anything.
“I ruined my business by supporting Nazis and it’s all your fault!”
“I’m in a government that condones - if not encourages - businesses from rejecting customers based on their own ideology, but don’t do it to me!”
Musk is not just supporting Nazis, he is a flaming Nazi himself.
Yes but this all happened before he even went full mask off.
Yes it absolutely did, but the platform was not run responsibly, and contained hate speech. Musk even claimed the Nazi content besides adverts was a rare fluke.
Which is obvious today is not true. What Musk may really want, is to normalize Nazi content.
I’m torn about disliking this douchebag and liking that Nestlé is getting sued…
On the scale of who is fucking up the world more, I’d have to award the trophy to Leon. Certainly fuck Nestle, but won’t someone please rid us of this meddlesome billionaire?
Elon is a twat and a menace for sure, but Nestlé have employed business strategies that literally killed infants and caused malnourishment…they are a completely different league of evil, far far worse than what Elon has done so far.
Key part of that sentence is “so far”
Yeah, I tend to believe it would be better to stop the entity that has currently done the most harm, with no intent to stop, first…I’m weird like that.
Maybe both at the same time. It’s possible to do two things.
He’s levying tithes.
He should sue everyone that left X!!
Nothing says you believe in free market competition more, than suing a another private business, trying to force them to give you money
That has always been the essence of the “Free Market”, for thee but not for me.
“Free market” was nothing but a propaganda term…
You know you’ve fucked up when even Nestlé doesn’t want to work with you…
Obligatory Fuck Nesté
When people go we may use child slaves in our supply chain, steal and ruin water supplies, and bribe medical professionals to get discourage breastfeeding, but you’re too fucked up for us to work with then you know you’ve fucked up.
To be clear, its not that twitter is too fucked up for nestle to work with, they absolutely would if they thought it would benefit them. Its that twitter has become so toxic that they see advertising there as a net negative.
To be able extra clear, fuck twitter, fuck nestle and fuuuuuuuck Musk.
In a sane world, this lawsuit would be laughed out of court.
It’s harder to laugh it out of court when the plaintiff is in the government himself.
There’s gotta be serious repercussions for this insane narcissist-autocratic behaviour. USA you’re not just embarrassing, but a liability.
What person in it right mind initiate a legal battle with Nestlé??
Plenty actually, like former slaves from plantations which sold products to Nestle.
…it’s part of the reason why Nestle is currently lobbying the EU to not dilute the supply chain act, those kinds of cases are a PITA for them, and the documentation they need to do for the supply chain act is exactly what they need to nib cases in the bud, “Here’s the inspections we did, here are transcripts of anonymous interviews with random workers at the plantation”, “If something slipped between the cracks we deeply regret that but we did do our due diligence, plaintiff’s beef is with their ex boss, not with us”.
It is absolutely more expensive to pay an army of lawyers to defend yourself than it is to pay workers proper local wages and document that. Not to mention that people who run slave plantations don’t share their extra profit with Nestle.
The other reason is that they don’t want smaller companies to have a competitive advantage: Smaller companies are not subject to those kinds of lawsuits, and also the ones complaining about the supply chain act. Nestle is also not at all keen on a consumer boycott from Africa.
Throwing a temper tantrum because no-one wants to play with you. What a child!
Are boycotts illegal? In this case I doubt there was an organized attempt, just some companies making individual business decisions. But even if Twitter can prove there was a boycott, is there a law against that?
deleted by creator
Surely it’s up to the advertisers to choose where who they pay money to use?
Boycotts are absolutely legal, you are completely entitled to decide who you don’t want to do business with. However, illegality is no longer required for the justice system to be weaponized against you, and President Musk just wants to make an example to others who might not want to do business with an actual Nazi.
The law doesn’t matter. With Musk’s position in the government this will basically end up as extortion: Settle or I’ll make things difficult for you.
Are boycotts illegal?
It depends on the boycott.
Hey Elmo, you told the advertisers to “go fuck yourself” in no uncertain terms, even repeating yourself for dramatic effect.
Hey I’ve got an idea Elmo. Go fuck yourself.
