After years of pressure from the Boycott, Divestment, and Sanctions movement, which has intensified in recent months, the German company Puma announced on December 12 that it will drop its sponsorship of the Israel Football Association.

  • Drinvictus@discuss.tchncs.de
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    11 months ago

    Nice. Ik getting everything Puma now. I think the other side of a targeted boycott is to show support for any company that makes the right decision.

    • ElleChaise@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      11 months ago

      Now we have a whole new chapter in the debate. Is it okay that some companies will follow suit just for the money? Do we say “It’s okay to jump on this bandwagon”. Personally I don’t care if there’s a ‘being good’ competition, so long as the being good is more than superficial. Curious to hear what others think.

      • Drinvictus@discuss.tchncs.de
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        11 months ago

        Oh i have absolutely zero doubts that they do it for the money. The same argument is very commonly brought up for companies celebrating Pride Month. But even if they do it for money it still brings attention to a movement. Especially if they make more money after a decision. Then others might follow.

  • library_napper@monyet.cc
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    11 months ago

    Puma itself claimed that the decision to end its sponsorship was taken a year ago, and had nothing to do with the global movement for Palestine. The Israeli Football Association rejected what BDS claimed, stating that it was a “pathetic attempt…to mislead” and that it rejected the option to extend its contract with Puma back in September.