• postmateDumbass@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    7 months ago

    that is not a resonable test in this situation.

    Dont use ‘woman’ as an adjective. No need. Just use dainty/frail vs. burly.

    • aidan@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      7 months ago

      Okay, but they did. I see how it sounds sexist, but how is it actually sexist? Dainty women do exist, and are on average, more dainty than dainty men.

        • aidan@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          7 months ago

          Well, using the stereotype is to reinforce their point. It’s a argumentative tactic. Like if someone said “eating greasy McDonald’s or whatever”, they could have just said “eating unhealthy food” but using specific imagery that plays into stereotypes gives a more emotional reaction.

            • aidan@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              7 months ago

              Maybe, I’m not sure where I fall on that. I view it basically the same as like the “fat American” stereotype- so is that xenophobic? Actually I would say that is worse, because being dainty isn’t necessarily a negative trait to many people.

              • postmateDumbass@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                7 months ago

                Hmm trying to shore up a losing argument with a flanking maneuver, using the same trite tactic, to nations instead of gender.

                Going after redheads next?