I’m relatively new to the linux space, I was introduced by the steam deck which uses kde, and it’s pretty similar to windows in terms of how it works so that’s the DE i’d be leaning towards when I eventually switch. I’ve never used gnome so i’m not sure if it’d be worth using I guess?

So I’m just looking for some input from the community, do you use Gnome or Plasma, why do you use it, and what’s kind of like a pros and cons kinda thing between the two?

  • Drito@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    2 days ago

    You are used to KDE and Gnome is very different But also KDE is buggy, I dont know how Steamdeck people make it better. If you chose Xfce, you will get a KDE similar desktop but more robust. Xfce can look modern with few efforts. MX Linux distro is a good example of a nice Xfce config.

  • mlg@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    4 days ago

    KDE for best fully integrated, out of box, modern DE.

    XFCE + Compiz if you’re running on lower end hardware (uses less ram and utilizes gpu better). Also if you want even more customization than KDE with the drawback of limited SVG support (and still on X11 if that matters for you)

    GNOME if you hate yourself and want to use a knockoff of ChromeOS or Mac.

    Cinnamon and MATE if you want to see when GNOME used to be good.

    LXQt is the XFCE equivalent of KDE, but is now on wayland with GPU accel, so it can fit the same area as XFCE+Compiz.

    Wayfire (compositor) basically Compiz for Wayland if you want all the fancy effects on anything that uses wayland.

  • SevereLow@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    4 days ago

    I use GNOME and I enjoy it a lot. If you decide to go with GNOME, imho try to install as few extensions as possible so that you can experience the desktop environment the way it’s intended by the developers. Of course, if it’s not for you, then with the help of extensions you can adapt it to your liking.

    Pros:

    • Beautiful to look at and gets out of the way. GNOME scored great productivity gains for me.
    • Fast, responsive and very stable (I’m on Fedora 40).
    • Great experience with flatpaks.
    • The best touchpad gestures in the world. Any DE, any OS.

    Cons:

    • Even though it is very stable, sometimes it crashes. Last time the crash was caused by Thunderbird; then I switched Thunderbird to flatpak too, so that if it crashes again it will not bring down the whole DE (applause to flatpak for delivering the tech 👏). Disclaimer: prior to the crash, I haven’t shut down / restart my laptop for 20 days… it might not be Thunderbird alone that caused the problem.

    🚧⚠️ That said, there’s currently a really annoying bug in GNOME that causes HUGE (or even - INSANE!) disk I/O! I don’t know when it is going to be fixed, but for the first time in two years this made me consider trying other desktop environments.

  • JasonDJ@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    4 days ago

    I use KDE for desktops/workstations and Gnome where I want more of a 10ft interface…like HTPC, or if I have a touchscreen device.

  • JustVik@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    4 days ago

    I use lxqt mostly beacause it’s simple and moderately lightweight.

  • WereCat@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    4 days ago

    I just like GNOME better. Especially on a laptop. KDE is technically better on a desktop but all the things that annoy me on KDE tip the scales enough for me to use GNOME instead.

  • kuneho@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    4 days ago

    I settled with Plasma. It has its fair share of issues, mostly minor things compared to coming from Windows and its environment. But you really can customize it the way you want and it’s relatively comfortable, so I’m fine with it. I still miss the old KDE3, but I’m not that hardcore to use Trinity. Not even sure how’s Trinity nowadays.

    Gnome 3 is just not my world, at all… at least, for desktop. I kinda use it on my htpc if I need an environment. That, or Xfce. I can imagine on a palmtop pc or other portable device that runs Linux, either with or without a touchscreen Gnome could be a pretty decent choice. Also, I’m sure I could/would get used to it if there’s nothing else, but there are other options so I’m not going to sit down and get to (re)know Gnome, tho it’s not like I’m against it.

  • thepiguy@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    4 days ago

    I use a window manager on my desktop, and gnome on my laptop. Gnome’s gestures are amazing with a touchpad

    • ___@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      4 days ago

      Agreed, Mutter’s 2 finger and 3 finger swipes (similar to macOS) are one reason why I haven’t jumped from Gnome yet

  • somenonewho@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    4 days ago

    Started on Gnome 2 for a short stint then used Unity for a while (used to be Ubuntus DM). When I switched away from Ubuntu I was still looking for something “familiar” so switching to Gnome (it was like 3.8 at the time) felt right. Have been using Gnome ever since.

    I’ve thought about switching to KDE a few times (when Gnome made some bone headed decision) but the way key combos and workflows are ingrained to me I would just set up any DE to feel like Gnome so why should I switch.