I used google for most of my life, for the past couple months I’ve been using brave search, but I still end up using google often because google images is far better than brave search images. I’m also worried that maybe brave search isn’t the best choice. What would you guys recommend?

      • serenissi@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        4 days ago

        Like what? I mean you don’t save cookies/local storage either, or use private browsing always.

        At most google see your search terms, results you click and your ip address. Unless you’re using ipv6 without rotation or with unique prefix there is no identifying information.

  • pineapple@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    7 days ago

    I have used brave search which was really good I really liked the ai search although i moved away from it after seeing how bad google ai search was (saying things like its a good idea to eat rocks due to not being able to recognise satire) and I managed to get brave to do the same thing with a different onion article so i dont really trust any ai search now. At the moment I use searx it’s incredibly private especially if you are willing to self host (I am not) and you have so much customisation you can use any search index so you don’t have to worry about bad results.

    Qwant also seams really good although I haven’t tried it, same with ecosia especially if you like planting trees although I use an ad blocker so that doesn’t work for me.

    Imo there are so many great free browsers it’s not really worth paying for a browser.

    I also don’t recommend duck duck since it used to have a tracking deal with Microsoft. It doesn’t have it anymore but I think it’s enough to lose faith in it.

      • pineapple@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        5 days ago

        I don’t really see why this is relevant unless google or bing results are bad (and from my experience they are pretty good) since privacy focused search angines anonymize all search engine requests so you can’t be tracked by google or bing. Also that map really is outdated brave uses it’s own indexing now so it no longer relies on google.

  • countrypunk@slrpnk.net
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    7 days ago

    Marginalia isn’t a daily driver search engine, but it specifically gets you obscure results. Pretty nifty side-engine to have.

  • Tzeentch@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    8 days ago

    This is probably the best resource for keeping track of which search engine options exist and what their quality is like: https://seirdy.one/posts/2021/03/10/search-engines-with-own-indexes

    For a “fire and forget” option that doesnt require any configuration you cant go wrong with good ol DuckDuckGo: https://duckduckgo.com

    If you’re okay with dealing with more configuration and breakage then Searx can be pretty powerful as its a metasearch engine that can search with every search engine you tell it at once and agregate the results(while proxying things to maintain privacy): https://searx.space (had decent luck with the https://search.sapti.me instance if you just wanna try it out without searching through a list of options)

    Also all search engines are kinda bad due to SEO spam and “AI” generated images and articles polluting the results, consider using uBlacklist to help you filter out the trash from search results(think of it like ublock origin for search engine results), can use it for basically any search engine so no reason to not set it up: https://github.com/iorate/ublacklist

      • Ballissle@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        7 days ago

        Oh really? I’ll look more into that thanks.

        I saw people mentioning an open source and self hostable search engine (SearXNG) which is cool and I tried it out but it gives not very good results. I tried searching for specific sites and it would show anything but. But it’s fine for general info.

        I still don’t think there is anything else other than startpage that is as private while giving good search results. I don’t believe that startpage is collecting data on users like google/Microsoft do and I don’t think duckduckgo is as good in that regard either. It still makes sense for startpage to be owned by an advertising company since it does show ads mixed with the search results. The difference is they are not personalised or tracked to you (so they say).

        So if you have any evidence of System1/startpage tracking users and collecting personalised data on users for anything other than general usage and diagnostic analytics then I think it’s fine. If you do, then I will stop using and recommending it.

  • Rikj000@discuss.tchncs.de
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    8 days ago

    SearXNG: https://github.com/searxng/searxng

    It enhances and respects privacy,
    is open source and self hostable,
    and queries multiple configurable search engines (google, bing, brave, duckduckgo, …)

    You can find a list of public hosted instances here:
    https://searx.space/

    However I prefer to slap an instance randomizer on top, so each of my queries goes through another public SearXNG instance, for more privacy, and mostly, to bypass rate-limiting after frequent queries.

    For this I use:

  • twinnie@feddit.uk
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    8 days ago

    I also use DuckDuckGo. If I find I’m not seeing the results I want i just add !g anywhere and the search gets sent over to Google, though I don’t find I need to do that very often.

  • Mountain_Mike_420@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    8 days ago

    Stop using search engines and start using ai. Especially ai that links to sources is much better than weeding out the heavily influenced search results. Using ai is like opening 10 search results finding the relevant sources and comparing them all to bother the information down to a digestible nugget.

    • RandomVideos@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      7 days ago

      Do you know which AI to use?

      Every time i tried it, it gave me wrong information or combined outdated information with current one

      • yo_scottie_oh@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        7 days ago

        I’ve gotten pretty good results from Perplexity. The responses contain links to sources, Wikipedia style, which enables me to verify the answers in the AI generated response.

  • notprogrammer@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    8 days ago

    I use Brave Search (yeah from the browser) and it works pretty good. Their privacy policy seems fairly robust at least according to my understanding and they have their own index, so they don’t rely on Google or Bing, which allows them to filter out the SEO Spam rampant on other engines.

  • otterpop@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    8 days ago

    I’ve really been enjoying Kagi. They seem to have a pretty good privacy policy as well. However Searxng is probably the best for privacy since it’s self hosted.

  • joe_@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    8 days ago

    I use Bing because it gives points at ~$5/month from letting it spy on you. Microsoft doubles their points to $10/month when you send to a charity. Using Bing vs technically/privately better options gets ~$120/yr sent to the FSF. I asked FSF and they validated that they get what MSFT says they send.

    Regarding more privacy-marketed search engines, I perceive the privacy argument from corporate search as marketing. Any corporate search engine should be selling your data to maximize profit, even if you pay monthly.