Google DeepMind co-founder Mustafa Suleyman warns AI is a ‘fundamentally labor replacing’ tool over the long term::Despite today’s AI hype, it’s still a “truly transformational” technology that will replace jobs unless policy steps in, Suleyman said.

  • wahming@monyet.cc
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    10 months ago

    I WOULD like to pump my own gas, please. Don’t force me to pay somebody else to do it for me

    • vmaziman@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      10 months ago

      While I agree that less mindless work is better as someone from nj, it’s quite nice not having to get out of my car to pump gas when it’s cold windy rainy or snowing or stupidly hot

      They also wipe windshields and rear windows for free with the squeegee stick

      Maybe in some future where we drive up to automated car chargers that can plug ur car in or auto battery swaps I’ll call gas pumpers redundant but honestly It’s not that bad a deal if it needs a person

  • Croquette@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    10 months ago

    It sucks because it should be a good thing that it replaces labor. We could have more time to be humans.

    But instead, less labor = more money for the rich and more misery for the rest

    • Wanderer@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      10 months ago

      Tax the rich, (not taxing AI that would be stupid) and redistribute the money via UBI.

      Also reduce work week to 4 days and have mandatory overtime for working more than 32 hours a week. Work week to be reduced as ai replaces more jobs.

      Nobel please.

  • LWD@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    10 months ago

    …Which means people can labor less without losing their quality of life, right?

  • AutoTL;DR@lemmings.worldB
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    10 months ago

    This is the best summary I could come up with:


    The Oxford dropout worked as a negotiator for the United Nations and the Dutch government early in his career, but then pivoted to AI and founded DeepMind in 2010 alongside Demis Hassabis and Shane Legg.

    The machine learning lab grew like a weed under Suleyman, with the backing of Peter Thiel’s Founders’ Fund, before selling to Google parent company Alphabet for £400 million in 2014.

    While Suleyman expects AI to “augment us and make us smarter and more productive for the next couple decades,” over the long term, its impact is still “an open question.”

    In a Jan. 10 Wired article, MIT professor Daron Acemoglu predicted that AI would disappoint everyone in 2024, proving itself merely a form of “so-so automation” that will take jobs from workers but fail to deliver the expected monumental improvements to productivity.

    The true impact of AI, from its ability to birth revolutionary technologies to its potential to stoke epic job losses, likely won’t hit for years.

    “AI is truly one of the most incredible technologies of our lifetimes, but at the same time, it feels like expectations about its delivery are higher than they’ve ever been and maybe we have hit a kind of peak hype for this moment,” he explained.


    The original article contains 770 words, the summary contains 207 words. Saved 73%. I’m a bot and I’m open source!

  • trackcharlie@lemmynsfw.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    10 months ago

    No shit?

    That’s why these companies need to be taxed heavier (and tax loopholes closed) in order to cover basic necessities and reeducation of the workforce using UBI.

  • Yardy Sardley@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    10 months ago

    Sucks that we live in the one timeline where AI is guaranteed to become an agent of coercion and exploitation, and do a better job than any human at optimizing the system of inequality.

  • maness300@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    10 months ago

    Good?

    Why don’t we want machines doing the work we don’t want to do?

    Oh right, white collar workers want to hold everyone else back so they don’t have to adapt.

    Where have I seen this before…

  • crystalmerchant@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    10 months ago

    Yeah no shit. Any media hack who tells you otherwise is misinformed, on some hidden payroll, or willfully ignorant

    New technologies are eventually used to disenfranchise and disempower people.

    • maness300@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      10 months ago

      New technologies are eventually used to disenfranchise and disempower people.

      Lol, what? Are you familiar with the Luddites?