• hexortor@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    8 months ago
    1. modern websites are a pain to navigate with popups, paywall, ads, heavy tracking that slows down navigation, autoplaying video ads etc

    2. modern journalism = let’s just report whatever the person or company says without fact checking, contextualizing or taking a stance. I believe this is done because it takes less effort and because it makes sure that the news org doesn’t anger any of the persons/organizations it has tides with (for ads or direct funding)

    The comments solve both problems, as lemmy is ad- and tracking-free and the people in the comments are mostly real people usually without any vested interests in the things they’re discussing.

    So OBVIOUSLY I only read the comments. I’ll get the content of the article indirectly as it’s being discussed.

    • lightnsfw@reddthat.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      8 months ago

      Also you can use the comments to determine if the article is even worth reading so you don’t accidentally give a click to some hack journalism.

  • Sem@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    8 months ago

    I’m not sure that lemmy users are different in this from user of Reddit/HackerNews/Facebook/etc.

  • li10@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    8 months ago

    I read the TLDR bot at least…

    Seems like that gives 90% of the relevant info, then I view the article if there’s anything missing.

    Not that it makes a difference, my opinions are formed before I even read the title. I’m dug in, and I’ll never change 😎

    • BruceTwarzen@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      8 months ago

      I always read the top comment first, because often they have a better article or explain why the article is misleading

      • lobut@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        8 months ago

        Yeah, I go top comment(s) to see if the article is not clickbait. Then I’ll read the summary to see if it’s any good. Then I’ll go to the article itself if those check out.

      • Sotuanduso@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        8 months ago

        But what if that comment is instead downvoted to death because it goes against the community opinions?

    • zip@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      8 months ago

      I’m dug in, and I’ll never change 😎

      'Cause we don’t have to! 'Cause we’re AMERICANS! We won’t change our minds on anything, regardless of the facts that are set out before us.

      Rock, flag, and eagle! Right, li10?

    • bartolomeo@suppo.fi
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      8 months ago

      I didn’t read the text, just came to comments to see what it was about. Now I know, this is a meme.

  • KrokanteBamischijf@feddit.nl
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    8 months ago

    Not necessarily a bad thing though.

    Think of it this way: There’s value in having access to a list of curated content others have deemed “worth reading or looking at”. But there is just as much value in engaging in some banter, provided it doesn’t lead to outright war in the comments.

    I admit, it is tiresome trying to seriously discuss a topic when people haven’t actually read the article, but there is still an upside to a topic triggering at least enough interest to where people actually want to engage.

  • KeenFlame@feddit.nu
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    8 months ago

    Why would I risk my psyche, phone, and integrity going to a infested wild media web page, it’s like you think this is reddit and I’m a curious teen

  • r00ty@kbin.life
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    8 months ago

    Well, I’m not a lemmy user. But I generally read the comments to gauge whether it is worth reading the article.

  • Semi-Hemi-Demigod@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    8 months ago

    I tried to read the article but it was paywalled. Or it wanted me to turn off my ad blocker before I could read the article. Or it was a video. Or the source was something like www.patriotusaeaglenews.ru.

    • Sotuanduso@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      8 months ago

      The first two can often be thwarted by turning off Javascript. And if it still doesn’t work, it probably wasn’t worth your time anyways.

      • mryessir@lemmy.sdf.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        8 months ago

        You ever used the web with javascript disabled? How do you do this on a mobile device? Are you sticking to this setting?

        Lemmy is awesome to me for this reason: Mostlikely the bot comment is either at the top, or at the bottom. Former tells me that bo expert has yet entered the conversation. Maybe I have meaningful insight (I haven’t yet. My shame). The latter shows me I need to read the tldr first, before proceeding to read the conversation. Or maybe I have already cosumed the article and I am still looking for other views on it.

        Anyhow, I think it shows that the internet nowadays does no spread information, but user data.

        • Sotuanduso@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          8 months ago

          I only turn off javascript on specific annoying websites. Then it stays off for that website. I don’t know how to do that on mobile.

  • andrew_bidlaw@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    8 months ago

    Many articles are only accessible via a VPN, blocked either by my side or theirs. I’m too tired to switch it on and off. Summary bot is very helpful.

  • tygerprints@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    8 months ago

    Boy ain’t that the truth, I like his bulging eyeballs and rabid frantic posturing. That’s me, I’m all too guilty of doing the same.