it does say that theres only 20 in the label, but im more pissed about the waste. everything couldve been put on 3 trays

  • Sadrockman@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    10 months ago

    Medicinal clamshell package. I ain’t even upset about all the excess packaging. I’m pissed at the fact you need a circular saw to open your medicine just to take the daily dose.

  • Mario_Dies.wav@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    10 months ago

    The only time I’ve seen something like this is when my doctor really wanted me to try an anti-depressant, so he gave me a perpetual supply of free samples.

  • funkajunk@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    10 months ago

    Why not put them all in one little baggy? That’s how I buy my pills from Rick.

  • DaCrazyJamez@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    10 months ago

    There are many reasons these may be pacakaged this way: from lowering the possibility of accidentally taking the wrong pill to anti-theft.

    It would be cheaper for the manufacturer to just put them all in a bottle, so rest assured they wouldn’t do this if the benefits didn’t outweigh the costs.

    • stebo@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      10 months ago

      I’m willing to believe there’s a reason to have them separated but why would they use such a large packaging for it?

      • SpiderShoeCult@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        10 months ago

        blistering machines used in the pharmaceutical industry usually work with some standard sizes, hence the size of the blister. change parts also cost a small fortune, so it makes no sense to have them tailored for just one product if it works well enough with existing equipment. thay being said, a couple of things below in reply to the whole thread, not just yourself.

        to add to the list of reasons one would want them individually packaged, it’s easier to dispense a set amount of pills in this manner, for medicine that needs to be tailored for each user more often (think if you need 5 capsules, you’d get a blister that is weirdly cut by the pharmacist with a pair of scissors - cutting the blister also removes important information like lot number and expiry date). also, it could have some stability issues outside of the blister, so dispensing them naked in bottles might not be the best thing.

        for antibiotics and such, it’s also crucial to take each and every dose prescribed so dropping one in the sink accidentally when you’re shaking a bottle is something you’re trying to prevent. the size of the blister would also make it harder to lose around the house or one’s backpack/bag/purse/saddlebags/bag of holding and then not taking your last dose (in addition to the change parts thing mentioned at the start).

        individually wrapped bananas are a waste. for critical things like pharmaceuticals, there is more likely than not a good reason for this. look up pharmacovigilance if curious to know more.

  • reddithalation@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    10 months ago

    i think that might be a suicide prevention measure, i remember something about blister packaging helping reduce suicide rates.

    • bluewing@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      10 months ago

      You will also often see such packaging used with in hospitals, group homes, and nursing homes. It helps to limit med errors for nurses and cnas and can allow some mentally handicapped people or elderly to have some control over their lives.

      It’s not a common packaging you are going to get from a pharmacy unless specified for you by a doctor.