• TommySoda@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    10 hours ago

    With how they treat the things they are supposedly good at, I can only imagine how catastrophic this could be. I don’t think you’d want the people working at a nuclear power plant to be so overwhelmed with work they need to piss in bottles.

    • Tarogar@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      8 hours ago

      Come on… Shitty safety measures have never, ever, in the history of mankind led to catastrophic events with a lasting fallout. -some government that collapsed

      After all after some point safety is just pure waste of money. -some dead CEO

      It doesn’t take enshittification for something real bad to happen. All it takes is time. Add the mentioned enshittification and corner cutting and we know for sure what will happen…

      Or how the saying in EvE online goes : it’s not a question on if your ship gets blown up but a question of when it gets blown up.

  • MajorHavoc@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    12 hours ago

    Was the byline written by AI?

    This comment was also brought to you by the artificial intelligence boom, and has as much to do with it.

    You can still purchase this comment as an NFT.

    I’m working with a supplier to create a limited edition Pog, with this comment printed on it.

    This is the official comment of the new millennium.

    This comment is drifting slowly backwards in time, in hopes of escaping the AI hype machine into an earlier, equally stupid hype train, but one made more tolerable by nostalgia.

    This comment still only costs 5 cents.

  • DMCMNFIBFFF@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    12 hours ago

    These renewables, however, are intermittent sources of power, while data centers need a steady supply to run all the time. The tech companies are currently reliant on the grid whenever the wind isn’t blowing or sun isn’t shining.

    Gee, if only if they could have, say, containers of substances that could hold an electrical charge: perhaps—if you will—a “battery” of such containers.

    • leisesprecher@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      11 hours ago

      I get your point, but have you looked into the power demands of data centers? They already have room filling batteries for power outages, but those are just enough to keep the lights on while the diesel generators start.

      • mosiacmango@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        10 hours ago

        There are immense capacity utility scale batteries available now from 100s of vendors. They would be roughly 100x easier to build than a nuclear power plant, even with a solar farm attached.

        The most recent nuclear power plant built in the US was the 2 new units at the Vogtle plant in Georgia. They took 11 years and 34 billion dollars to build.

        A comparable solar + battery plant that’s being built in Nevada is projected to cost 1.1 billion. No time-drained is given, but 3 years is not uncommon for these large solar projects.

        So the above coats would have to balloon 30x and the project would have to take 4x the expected time to get close to costing the same as the most recent US nuclear project, for the same energy generation/storage capacity.

        It’s honestly baffling why these companies are trying to spin up nuclear plants instead of pushing ahead with more grid renewables.

        • leisesprecher@feddit.org
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          10 hours ago

          This is just the peak power. The average power is much less. And batteries can maybe work on a grid scale for smoothing, but not for an individual consumer like a data center.