+/-95%
“AI experts’ predictions should not be seen as a reliable guide to objective truth”
This is the best summary I could come up with:
In the short term, researchers estimate AI will become significantly more advanced, able to create a Top 40 pop song and write an NYT bestseller before 2030.
“While AI experts’ predictions should not be seen as a reliable guide to objective truth, they can provide one important piece of the puzzle,” said researchers from Berkeley and the University of Oxford who conducted the study in December.
“Their familiarity with the technology and the dynamics of its past progress puts them in a good position to make educated guesses about the future of AI.”
The study highlights the perceived danger around creating a powerful artificial intelligence from the world’s leading researchers.
Anthropic has a constitution laid over its AI systems to ensure they act in alignment with our society’s rules.
Experts anticipate that AI will be able to assemble LEGOs, translate newfound languages, and build video games before 2033.
The original article contains 402 words, the summary contains 148 words. Saved 63%. I’m a bot and I’m open source!
this is just a subset of the 100% chance humans will cause human extinction.
‘by ai’ is just one of very many options were looking into…
“Researchers say”
Researchers also say things they pulled out of their ass 90% of the time.
Source: I researched it
Guys who’s job depends on hype around their field continue to hype their field. News at 11.
All that ad space just to leave out the whys.
Didn’t a bunch of “researchers” think the world was going to end in 2012 for some reason?
No?
I mean, if you stretch those airquotes pretty hard, but not sure why you’d compare those people to this case
