It feels like every few months there’s a new tech “revolution” being hyped up as the future. Besides AI, what’s the most overhyped trend in tech right now? For me, it’s the constant buzz around the metaverse.

  • meliante@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    7 days ago

    Electric cars and bigger vehicles. The electricity storage tech is just not there yet. However, I think it’s perfectly suitable for personal transportation like scooters and bikes.

    • Joelk111@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      6 days ago

      My electric skateboard still blows my mind. It’s crazy how well it works as compared to gasoline skateboards.

    • realitista@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      6 days ago

      For me, the sweet spot is in plug in hybrids, as long as you actually, you know, plug them in. You can cover all your daily commute and grocery getting 100% electric and then if you need to take a longer trip occasionally, you’re covered by the gasoline engine. We use like one tank of gas every 4 months on ours.

  • shirro@aussie.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    7 days ago

    Anything hyped on Hacker News. Tech bros are only about their big payday. Very little of their shit improves the world and they disrupt industries and social structures without creating worthwhile replacements. They receive too much attention and have way too much access to capital which could be used more productively elsewhere. They are ruining my enjoyment of technology. I am very wary of services infringing my privacy, stealing my intellectual works, leaving me open to hackers, marketers and predatory business models, putting people out of work, promoting unfair employment practices, disconnecting people from their friends, family and community, promoting social division etc.

  • helenslunch@feddit.nl
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    7 days ago

    For me, it’s the constant buzz around the metaverse.

    What in the world is the “metaverse”? Are you referring to the thing “Meta” tries to call virtual reality?

    • frog_brawler@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      8 days ago

      It wasn’t a very long initial question (only a few sentences), but you somehow missed the only qualifier to the whole thing, “…Besides AI,” within that short intro.

      • otp@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        8 days ago

        It is kind of misleading to leave it out of the title and hide it in the middle of the post. “Besides AI” could’ve easily fit in the post title.

          • otp@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            8 days ago

            The post title was an entire thought in the form of a question. It invited people to come and share their opinions.

            Not to mention that in many clients, the title is presented first before the post body. So someone could come up with their answer after reading everything initially presented to them about this post.

            Also, skimming is a useful thing that people do, lol

          • corsicanguppy@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            8 days ago

            There’s an entire sub-sector based on that cop-out defence. You’ve … heard of clickbait, right?

      • InvertedParallax@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        8 days ago

        Molten salt sounds like a terrible design for modular, the whole problem is if it loses power it freezes solid, you’d want a huge one with tons of backup imho.

        I’d imagine a tiny pebble bed or traveling wave, something fairly inert and safe.

        Edit: I guess that’s the point, give someone a reactor, if they screw it up it safely freezes dead. Problem solved.

      • SlopppyEngineer@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        8 days ago

        There have been others building a prototype or research reactor, but the M in SMR also stands for mass-produced and nobody got even close to that.

  • makingStuffForFun@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    8 days ago

    Melbourne street fashion. Literally asian style pump flip flops with socks half way up your calves. 80s tracksuit baggies. Trying REALLY hard to look like they’re not trying. The city is loving it.

  • StorageAware@lemmings.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    8 days ago

    Passkeys. They’ll probably improve eventually but I feel like right now it’s a mess.

    On Android you are forced to use the default implementation, only in 14 and above can you use password managers for them.

    On desktop it’s somewhat less messy but you can use the system storage or a password manager extension. Some sites only let you use them for 2FA, some full login, some can’t be put in a password manager from my experience and so on.

    Just a mess right now.

    • EngineerGaming@feddit.nl
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      7 days ago

      I am mostly concerned about potentially needing specific Big Tech implementations for them in some way… I don’t mind using, say, KeepassXC for it, because it is independent from any account or hardware, as well as easily backupable. But NOT anything tied to a Google or MS account.

      Maybe I am misunderstanding something, but Paypal says it restricts what passkeys can be used, so it is apparently possible:

      Passkeys are currently available for eligible personal accounts. An eligible Apple or Android device is required to create a passkey.

  • frog_brawler@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    8 days ago

    Other than AI, it’s automation. It’s pretty good when it works but has the same overall intent as AI (in reducing the human labor force), just on a smaller level. At least automation isn’t consistently delivering inaccurate information.

    • Vanth@reddthat.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      8 days ago

      I was at my company’s booth at a career fair earlier this week and it felt like every other student was looking for an internship in “machine learning”. When I asked follow up questions about what sort of experience they’d had or projects done or what they wanted to do with it in their career, crickets.

      To be fair, 2nd most popular was “CAD” which is also not a job.

        • Vanth@reddthat.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          edit-2
          7 days ago

          Do you just do CAD though? Our Mech Es do a lot in CAD but not solely. Even our drafters do a lot of things not in CAD. If anyone ever asked me what I do for work, “CAD” would not be my answer.

          I categorize it as a tool, not a job. And personally, I would find a job that is, say, 75% or more CAD to be boring as hell.

    • TimeSquirrel@kbin.melroy.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      8 days ago

      What sort of automation specifically are you referring to? I work in commercial building automation, which is basically tying various systems like fire/burg alarms, access control, energy/lighting management, intercoms, and everything else together using TCP/IP networking, RS-232/485, and dry-contact relay triggers everywhere. For instance, unlocking all doors and stopping elevator access when the fire alarm goes off. Or automatically disarming a burglar alarm and turning on the lights when the first person in the morning scans their badge. In that sense, it works great and has been working for decades.

      If you mean robots taking all our jobs, yeah that’s about 100 years out.

      • Tja@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        8 days ago

        Take a look at any factory floor and robots (machines) already have taken 80% of jobs.

        • Cryophilia@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          8 days ago

          I literally worked on a factory line in the summer of 2015 right next to the robot they built over the course of that summer to replace us. Felt like John Henry.

      • thanks_shakey_snake@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        8 days ago

        That’s super interesting. How do you get started at something like that? Or where would a newcomer start to learn more about it?

        • TimeSquirrel@kbin.melroy.org
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          7 days ago

          With me, I started applying at electronic security companies 20 years ago as a helper to pull cable and hang cameras, the simpler, more labor intensive stuff. They are always looking for people like that as the older folks like me go more into the head end set up and programming because our bodies hurt too much 😁. I learned 90% of what I know from on the job training, the rest I already had sort of a background in electronics because of my personal hobbies.

  • SlopppyEngineer@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    8 days ago

    Carbon capture tech.

    That one is still being promoted but in the end the CO2 is mainly used to get more oil out of wells.

  • Fizz@lemmy.nz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    8 days ago

    Mobile apps. They have so much money and users and it still feels like there isn’t as many cool mobile apps as there are cool computer program.

    Mobile apps often feel like a web browser with the URL bar.

    • WolfLink@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      7 days ago

      It’s totally possible to make cool mobile apps, but most of the ones you see are just a big company porting their website.

      • Fizz@lemmy.nz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        7 days ago

        I know but I expected there to be more cool apps and less shit ones. I’m disappointed by what mobiles have become.

      • kittenzrulz123@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        7 days ago

        RiscV is a fundamentally different story then Arm, currently speaking RiscV is not there yet however I have more hope in the future of RiscV then Arm. Both hardware and software side RiscV is not ready however the idea of a fully open source computer still excites me. I understand however that I may be speaking more out of idealism and im certainly biased however I still hope that RiscV overtakes Arm.

    • bokherif@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      7 days ago

      Well arm cpu’s get you insane battery life (ie. Macbook M series or new snapdragons). The architecture has not settled in yet but it will take some time

        • bokherif@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          7 days ago

          Considering these things can run heavy stuff even through emulation means the performance is there. The codes that these things run is just not optimized for the architecture yet. Once that’s done, I dont see a problem but yeah it’s early stages

          • tiddy@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            7 days ago

            If you run mostly Foss this isn’t even a problem, there’s almost always an arm build (prism launcher even has arm on windows support)

  • ShaunaTheDead@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    8 days ago

    I don’t understand the appeal of foldable screen smart phones. Seems like nothing more than a gimmick to me.

    • UnrepentantAlgebra@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      7 days ago

      We’ve reached the point where they can’t make phones any bigger unless you can fold them up.

      Agreed though it seems nuts to pay more for a “feature” on your phone that will only cause it to wear out faster.

  • kreliac@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    7 days ago

    5G, all phone carriers in my country promises gigabit speeds but in my tests results shows slower speeds than current 4G and coverage is worse

    • Tevren@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      7 days ago

      Not apologizing for carriers, some are really on the edge of lying to consumers, but you have to separate the 2 parts that make 5G different from 4G.

      1. Higher frequencies: means higher throughput but also shorter range (you can literally block that signal with your hand). Only works if your phone supports these higher frequency bands, you have to be in areas where the carrier has deployed cells supporting those, and you have to be close enough.
      2. Increased efficiency: mostly affects carriers, you likely won’t notice the difference. Basically means, areas that were congested before with LTE will now see less congestion.

      I found most 5G ads infuriating. If you know the tech, you understand whats going on and how they aren’t telling the complete story. If you don’t know the tech, you’ll think, “Yay, higher speeds.” Nope…

    • spazzman6156@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      7 days ago

      From what I understand, 5G was first about increased capacity. Increased speed was a secondary point. It optimizes how multiple users can share the same bands, and adds use of higher frequency bands that don’t propogate as far. So for very high congestion areas, they can deploy smaller cells and which each can maintain higher speeds per user. I think the “faster” part was just marketing to get users to buy into the new technology. I mean I think that was the intent. Something about the implementation needs tuning though.

    • sunzu2@thebrainbin.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      7 days ago

      It ain’t just your country… 5g speeds marketing was total bullshit.

      So if that was the lie… Why did they shill it so hard?