• kenkenken@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    4 months ago

    But why politicians spread propaganda on social networks? Drug dealers should ask them.

  • ThePrivacyPolicy@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    4 months ago

    I got an ad once for a group selling stolen credit card numbers too. I must have reported it at least a dozen times but it was always kept up and the report said it didn’t break any rules. It only got removed after I just skipped Facebook reports and reported to the police.

    • jeffw@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      4 months ago

      I’d be shocked if cops did anything with that. Local police are incompetent (and, to be fair, waaay under resourced) when it comes to cybercrimes. Who did you report it to?

      • BakerBagel@midwest.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        4 months ago

        You loval police force is probably the most well funded department of your city’s budget. It’s essentially a jobs program for your towns biggest assholes.

        • sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          edit-2
          4 months ago

          Sure, but they’re under-resourced for cybercrimes. They have a lot of beat cops out giving tickets and beating up black people, but probably nobody who knows anything about credit card scams.

          Local police need a readjustment of priorities and tiers of staff. Ideally we’d have:

          1. no force authorization and no weapons, can only issue citations - these would be your beat cops pulling people over, directing traffic, and responding to minor disputes
          2. detectives - no force authorization, but can investigate crimes - these show up after the crime to collect evidence
          3. armed enforcers - can arrest and use lethal force, and only show up if the first two groups can’t handle it; this is what we have today, but ideally would be a much smaller group than 1

          The cybercrime division would fall under group 2, and would probably be just one or two people trained on that type of detective work.

          Each tier should have a different uniform, so the public knows exactly who they’re dealing with, and each tier would be required to have body cam footage live-streamed to HQ. The first group makes up the biggest part of your force, and which is bigger between 2 and 3 depends on the types of crime that are prevalent in your area.

      • xor@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        4 months ago

        I guess the police at least are able to order Facebook to remove it (sounds like that’s what happened) but then yeah, as you say, I expect they will have just escalated to the county/state police, if anything

    • Otter@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      4 months ago

      We get posts here too, and on Reddit

      The posts here get reported and removed very quickly, sometimes within minutes of the account being created or the first post.

      I searched Reddit for the website they were linking and saw the spam posts on Reddit have been up for months.

      Few possible differences:

      • We have a better ratio of users/moderation, where the lower volume of posts means everything can go through human moderators

      • Our users are more actively trying to keep the platform good by reporting spam

      • The incentive here is to create a good online platform. The inventive there is profit. The priorities are different as a result

      • MajorHavoc@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        4 months ago

        Great points.

        I might add:

        I strongly suspect that a much bigger fraction of the free volunteer labor moved here, than anyone has realized.

        Zuck and Spez know how fucked they are, but they’re motivated to downplay the damage to their platforms.

        There’s an unvirtuous cycle where their platforms have under-resourced moderation, which has allowed bot proliferation, which has made unpaid moderation work a shittier job, which causes moderators to leave, which allows more bot proliferation.

        Folks here seem to be saying our moderation tools are objectively poor, but are getting better with each release. So it’s the bot spammers whose life gets harder, over time, here.

      • atrielienz@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        4 months ago

        It isn’t just those factors. There’s also the fact that instance owners would rather moderate than get on the wrong side of the law.

  • TachyonTele@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    4 months ago

    Facebook coke and E. Ehhhh that’s gotta be like asking for as much fentanyl cut in as possible.

  • Honytawk@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    4 months ago

    “Because we don’t check the content as long as they pay”

    God I wish he would just say the silent part out loud.

    • dan1101@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      4 months ago

      It’s too much trouble, we would only make 10.1 zillion instead of 10.3 zillion dollars!

  • pdxfed@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    4 months ago

    Zuck and his corporation are expectedly shit; C Corp with only one motive, enrichment. Fuck Zuck and all that, but…

    Congress, on the other hand, are supposed to represent the people and instead whore themselves out to the highest corporate bidders.

    "Why would you do such a thing?!? Fox #1 incredulously asked Fox #2!of his raiding of the henhouse.