• /home/pineapplelover@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 month ago

    I tried freezing my credit but I think transunion and equifax wouldn’t let me create an account for some reason. Asking me to call them. Anybody else running into the same issue?

    • return2ozma@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 month ago

      I know Ticketmaster just sent out millions of “sorry we got hacked, freeze your credit for free with this code” letters. Maybe they’re struggling to keep up with demand.

    • UselesslyBrisk@infosec.pub
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 month ago

      Are you proxying or using a VPN to access their site. I often see IP blocks, even if that proxy is a simple socks proxy to a VPS i own. Many VPS subnets are blocked/restricted wholesale, as are many of the big VPN endpoint ips.

    • ohlaph@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 month ago

      I did previously and had to wait until a weekday to talk to someone. It was a huge pain. Fuck those agencies.

      • cm0002@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        1 month ago

        Fuck those companies, they’d prefer that you thought of them as agencies because it makes them appear to be at least affiliated with the government.

        They’re not, they are private companies through and through

  • Confused_Emus@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 month ago

    Go ahead, steal my identity. See if you have any better luck with it.

    I keep all my credit reports frozen. These days, everyone should.

  • grte@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 month ago

    The personal data of 2.9 billion people, which includes full names, former and complete addresses going back 30 years, Social Security Numbers, and more, was stolen from National Public Data by a cybercriminal group that goes by the name USDoD. The complaint goes on to explain that the hackers then tried to sell this huge collection of personal data on the dark web to the tune of $3.5 million. It’s worth noting that due to the sheer number of people affected, this data likely comes from both the U.S. and other countries around the world.

    What makes the way National Public Data did this more concerning is that the firm scraped personally identifiable information (PII) of billions of people from non-public sources. As a result, many of the people who are now involved in the class action lawsuit did not provide their data to the company willingly.

    What exactly makes this company so different from the hacking group that breached them? Why should they be treated differently?

    • jaybone@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 month ago

      Same with the big three credit reporting bureaus Equifax and whoever the fuck. Did anyone ever give them permission to horde all of their personal info? I don’t think so.

    • ricecake@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 month ago

      I feel like that might be bad phrasing on the part of the article. They mainly aggregate public records, like legal document style public records, and they also scrapped data from not-(public record) data, which isn’t the same as (not-public) record data.

      I feel like I would want more details to be sure though, but scrapping usually refers to “generally available” data.

      • fmstrat@lemmy.nowsci.comOP
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 month ago

        That all depends. If they’re pulling that private data for use in questionnaires, the terms may not allow them to save it, but they scrape it from the form.

        • ricecake@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 month ago

          Yeah, it definitely might still be a bad data source,and it’s shady either way, just pointing out that “not public data” has a few meanings, and not all of them are synonymous with “private data”.

    • fmstrat@lemmy.nowsci.comOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 month ago

      All depends on the terms of use from those that provide the data to them that they scraped from. I bet they never expected a customer to do it.

  • MIDItheKID@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 month ago

    Is there a simple way to find out if your Information was in this leak, and what information it is? I use haveibeenpwned for leaks linked to my email address, but from I read in this article, it’s not linked to my email address.

    So how do I found out if my data was leaked without paying for a credit monitoring service?

  • CallateCoyote@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 month ago

    Dang, that’s quite a few people. Maybe we can stop linking our identity to a simple number in the US sometime? That would be swell.

  • AWittyUsername@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 month ago

    Is this why I got the latest scam email saying I need to pay $4k in bitcoin else a video of me wanking would be leaked.

  • A_A@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 month ago

    the U.S. and other countries “around the world”

    meaning, for those of us living on other planets, we are completely safe … such a relief ! /s

    • IllNess@infosec.pub
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 month ago

      It’s best to say around the world just so who ever is reading it doesn’t think it region specific.

      For example, they could say “the U.S. and other countries in the western hemisphere.”

      • A_A@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 month ago

        How do you like : “worldwide (including self centered U.S.A.)” 🤣 ?

        • IllNess@infosec.pub
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 month ago

          The other way works better since National Public Data is based in Florida and because of the name of the company. If it said “International” instead of “National” the readers would assume it is international data.

          Based on the location, name of the company, and the breach mentioning social security numbers, stating the US first is the most logical.

  • xthexder@l.sw0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 month ago

    How did this company leak 2.9 billion people’s info, including SSNs, when the population of the US is only ~350M?

    Is “National Public Data” collecting info on everyone internationally? So many questions…

    • CluelessLemmyng@lemmy.sdf.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 month ago

      When applying to a US government position with a certain security clearance, they will do background checks of you, your family and extended family, if need be.

      And I’m sure that can be the case for any employer who needs background checks. That being said, I also suspect some of these people in the database are dead.

    • HubertManne@moist.catsweat.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 month ago

      I just assume ssn is for a us audience and its worlwide with equivalent numbers but who knows. I mean there are only 8 bil on the planet so thats like everyone except maybe china, india, and africa

  • BingBong@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 month ago

    Identity theft monitoring services always scare me. It seems like you are dumping a huge amount of information into a single system and just hoping the vendor is secure. I have access to one but refuse to put much information in. Is this mindset incorrect?

    • AnarchistArtificer@slrpnk.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 month ago

      It reminds me of the recent Crowdstrike fiasco: apparently kernel level access was needed for their anti-malware to be able to properly work (because that way their net can cover the entire OS basically), but that high level of access meant that when CrowdStrike fucked up with an update, people’s computers were useless. (Disclaimer, I am not a cybersecurity person and am not offering judgement either way on whether Crowdstrike’s claim about kernel level access was bullshit or not)

      In a similar way, in order for identity theft monitoring services to work, they surely will need to hold a heckton of data about you. This is fine if they can be trusted to hold that data securely, but otherwise… ¯\_ (ツ)_/¯

      I share your unease, though I don’t feel able to comment on the correctness of your mindset. Though I will say that on an individual level, keeping an eye on your credit reports in general (from the major credit agencies) will go a long way to helping there (rather than paying for serviced that give you a score and other fancy “features”, you can request either free or v. low cost report which just has the important stuff you need to know.)

      I also know that if you want to be extra cautious, you can manually freeze your credit so basically no new lines of credit can be opened in your name. This is most useful for people who have already been a victim of fraud, or they expect to be at risk (such as by shitty family, or a data breach). I don’t know how one sets this up, but I know that if you did want to set up a new line of credit, you can call to unfreeze your credit, and then freeze it again when your application for the new credit is all done. I have a friend who has had this as their default for years now because of shitty family.

  • Fredselfish@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 month ago

    Oh well I feel at this point every man woman and child already had this done to them in United States and our government not doing shit about it.

  • Telorand@reddthat.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 month ago

    A complaint submitted to the US District Court for the Southern District of Florida claims the exposed personal data belongs to a public records data provider named National Public Data, which specializes in background checks and fraud prevention.

    What’s with these companies nobody has heard of causing massive fuck ups?

    • Telodzrum@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 month ago

      Because companies you’ve never heard of are the ones doing the infrastructure and data warehousing for the public-facing companies you have heard of.