• FiskFisk33@startrek.website
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    no, fuck murder.

    Don’t get me wrong, fuck poachers, but murder is never the solution, it just breeds escalated violence.

    • pm_boobs_send_nudes@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      Actually they tried the normal way, where they didn’t shoot and asked the poachers to surrender / tried to arrest them. But the rangers would get shot and the animals would continue to get poached.

      Seeing this as a problem, a new executive order / law was passed allowing shoot at sight orders at national parks / protected zones.

      Poaching has reduced, the number of rangers getting shot has reduced. The number of poachers getting shot has reduced (they don’t wanna fuck around anymore).

      Overall it has increased peace.

    • ramenshaman@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      Endangered-animal lives are much more precious to me than humans-who-are-willing-to-murder-endangered-animals lives, so I disagree.

    • WhatAmLemmy@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      While I like the idea of every poacher being neutralised, I also understand that the “poach police” may intentionally/inadvertently kill innocents with their blanket immunity; plus many poachers may be poor af hired-guns that aren’t the actual source or root cause for the market, and may not dent the trade at all… Hope I’m wrong.

      • KoboldCoterie@pawb.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 year ago

        I also understand that the “poach police” may intentionally/inadvertently kill innocents with their blanket immunity;

        Is there any evidence that that has been happening? (This article is from 2017, and it mentions “more than 20” poachers being killed in 2015, but doesn’t mention any non-poachers being killed, which it seems it would have, given it’s talking about the downsides.)

        While I agree that taking the fight to the people financing the poaching, reducing the number of poachers - and providing a very clear disincentive for other “poor af” hired-guns to take up the mantle - could still help.

        Personally, I don’t think any implied sanctity of human life extends to people who are killing endangered animals for profit.

  • DessertStorms@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    Fuck poachers, don’t get me wrong, but fucking hell, I wish people had the same kind of energy when it came to billionaires, who are literally responsible for the deaths of millions of humans (by virtue of hoarding so many resources as well as creating and maintaining a system that relies on exploitation and suffering to benefit them and only them).

    If only society cared about oppressed and marginalised people as much as it does about cute animals.