• octopus_ink@slrpnk.netOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      1 month ago

      I’m guessing the admits part and of course Trump is the current (quite jutified) bogeyman.

      • x00z@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 month ago

        Continuing to do business in the US after the CLOUD act already implied enough.

      • uranibaba@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 month ago

        Didn’t Microsoft say not too long ago not to worry, because they didn’t have to give access to data?

    • octopus_ink@slrpnk.netOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 month ago

      My assumption for many years now has been that the answer to any question involving MS giving access to your data is “yes.”

  • kleingartenganove@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 month ago

    As an EU citizen, I don’t find the idea of the US government having access to my data nearly as frightening as the idea of my own government getting into my accounts.

    • St3alth@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      1 month ago

      What if the US decided to share info about the data on your accounts to your government?

        • St3alth@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          30 days ago

          Pretty much, basically the country’s involved will share loads of intelligence with each other and data will be a big thing they’ll share.

  • emax_gomax@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 month ago

    I thought gdpr forced companies to store data securely in the eu. Are they saying they’ll transfer that data to the us to give Trump access, cause that’s a gdpr violation and should result in fines and eventual removal from the eu market.

    • Noxy@pawb.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 month ago

      The first sentence and the first paragraph of the article:

      even if that data is stored overseas

    • cley_faye@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      30 days ago

      There are provisions. I don’t remember the exact name of it, but basically, the US says “yah, these business are legit ok, you see?” and the EU is like “oh, ok, deal”. This includes the big providers and a handful of others, obviously.

      And yes, it is a farce.

  • Gerudo@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 month ago

    So we all agree that “if demanded” ANYONE’S data can be spied on. Doesn’t matter where.

    At least it’s finally admitted to out in the open.

  • OutlierBlue@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 month ago

    Anyone wonder where your country’s health records about all their citizens are stored? I’m guessing it’s all on either MS, AWS, or Google. That means Trump could get access to your medical history.

    This is important because of his attacks on LGBTQ people, vaccines, autism, and who knows what other nonsense he wants to persecute.

    And here in Canada the Liberal government is putting forth bill C-2, which opens up even more access to the US to get even records stored in Canada by Canadian companies.

    https://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2025/07/canadas-bill-c-2-opens-floodgates-us-surveillance

    Feel safe yet?

    • smiletolerantly@awful.systems
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      30 days ago

      In the case of Germany: confidential computing tech ensures all data is encrypted in storage and in memory, shielded even against data center employees / hosting providers. I imagine that’s become the standard for most countries.

      • cley_faye@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        30 days ago

        Hmm. Policies might say so. Not every business follow policies, whether they are their own or imposed ones, though. Business going all “it’s ok, our provider have the correct certifications for data handling” are definitely a thing.

    • lemonskate@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 month ago

      Only if they aren’t using customer provided encryption keys (is using blob/bucket storage) or an equivalent approach to encryption at rest, and make sure they’re doing standard TLS for encryption in flight.

      It’s absolutely possible, and standard for any decent organization, to build their cloud architectures to fully account for the cloud provider potentially accessing your data without authorization. I’ve personally had such design conversations multiple times.

      • cley_faye@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        30 days ago

        It is possible to do things correctly. The question is, is it done often, and is it done on hardware you can trust. I’m somewhat confident if I run my services on bare metal, the provider would have a hard time getting my encryption keys, although it’s not impossible even in this situation. How many people do so with VPS and managed instances, where snooping around the runtime and exfiltrating data unbeknownst to the user is trivial?

        Also, beyond that, how many fall for the convenience of things like SSE, whether it’s with customer provided keys or not? That should be a red flag, but people find it oh so convenient.

        We’re bound to see stuff bubble out where “we did all the right things” boils down to clicking a checkbox in some web UI and be done with it in the future.

    • Liberal_Ghost@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      30 days ago

      Yeah I wondered the same thing. That cloud act went into effect in 2018. Haven’t seen anyone try to change it in the last 6 years

      • Semperverus@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        30 days ago

        Listen, I’m extremely anti-trump but the guy has a point. Evil things can be evil regardless of who is in charge, but we only seem to care when the narrative shifts in certain directions. Why didn’t we care about this back then?

        • octopus_ink@slrpnk.netOP
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          30 days ago

          I haven’t used a Microsoft product in my personal life in twenty years. One of the primary reasons for that is that I don’t trust them with my privacy. People (gestures broadly at the tech space) have been expressing similar sentiment for decades.

          We are not a monolith, and some people have cared about these things while others have not.

          For those who only just began caring, I find it entirely reasonable that when the top of the pyramid wasn’t Trump, someone who there are a great many reasons to distrust, they weren’t as worried about it.

          If you didn’t care about it until recently, only you can answer the question you have asked.

          All of which is far more of an answer than the sheer whataboutism merited.

          • Semperverus@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            29 days ago

            Oh I most certainly cared back then, just felt like nobody wanted to listen to me. Full Linux, grapheneos stack with no google play services, no Microsoft, nearly free of google (replacing gmail is going to be a monumental task, but it’s my last one).

  • TomMasz@piefed.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 month ago

    There’s no telling if that hasn’t already happened. Europe needs to drop Microsoft ASAP.

  • MisterFrog@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    29 days ago

    It’s SO funny how apparently for almost 20 years we (as in the west outside the USA) decided that using Chinese cloud platforms or networking hardware was dangerous and to be avoided, but private US companies? Nothing to see here!

    Silver lining of the orange man is that maybe countries will wake up and smell the digital sovereignty that we sorely lack.